Esthetic Line
Narrow Diameter
Gingival Level
Monoblock
Katalogu Görüntüle
SD-Small Diameter Bileşenleri hakkında daha fazla bilgi için lütfen buraya tıklayın, bütün katalogu görüntüleyin ve indirin.
SD / Small Diameter Implants
Dar Çaplı diş implantları sistemi, çapları 1.8 mm, 2.1 mm, 2.4 mm ve 2.5 mm arasında değişen tek parçalı implant serisidir. Agresif dişlerin, ince dişlerin, halka ya da değil, O-küreli başlık ve kare başlık için beher çap seçeneği, piyasada bulunabilen en geniş mini diş implant aralığını sunmaktadır.
Choice between square or o-ball head depending on fixed or removable applications.
The lower aspect of the implant collar is endowed with micro grooves to help maintain cortical bone.
The fine thread SD implants are designed to facilitate the placement in hard bone.
The implant surface is blasted with aluminum oxide and then subjected to progressive etching using citric acid. This surface treatment accelerates the osteointegration process by providing a greater and more uniform area of contact between bone and implant while favoring an immediate implant load.
The top aspect of every collared implant is smooth so as to better accommodate soft tissue.
The aggressive thread for SD Implants are designed for the added compression and surface area required in soft bone placement.
7) Collared and non-collared models
C-tech provides SD models with and without gingival collars, allowing the practitioner to better address cases with differing gingival thicknesses.
The anatomically shaped implants are produced from medical grade 5 titanium.
Çap 1.8 İnce dişli implantlar
Halkalı 0-Küreli
ø 1,8/10 mm
CAB-10
ø 1,8/11,5 mm
CAB-11,5
ø 1,8/13 mm
CAB-13
ø 1,8/15 mm
CAB-15
ø 1,8/18 mm
CAB-18
0-Küreli Halkasız
ø 1,8/10 mm
NAB-10
ø 1,8/13 mm
NAB-13
ø 1,8/15 mm
NAB-15
Kare başlı ve halka
ø 1,8/10 mm
SAB-10
ø 1,8/13 mm
SAB-13
ø 1,8/15 mm
SAB-15
Çap 2.1 İnce dişli implantlar
Halkalı 0-Küreli
ø 2,1/10 mm
IAB-10
ø 2,1/11,5 mm
IAB-11,5
ø 2,1/13 mm
IAB-13
ø 2,1/15 mm
IAB-15
ø 2,1/18 mm
IAB-18
0-Küreli Halkasız
ø 2,1/10 mm
NIAB-10
ø 2,1/13 mm
NIAB-13
ø 2,1/15 mm
NIAB-15
Kare başlı ve halka
ø 2,1/10 mm
SIAB-10
ø 2,1/13 mm
SIAB-13
ø 2,1/15 mm
SIAB-15
Çap 2.5 İnce dişli implantlar
Halkalı 0-Küreli
ø 2,5/10 mm
MC/25/10
ø 2,5/13 mm
MC/25/13
ø 2,5/15 mm
MC/25/15
Kare başlı ve halka
ø 2,5/10 mm
MCA/25/10
ø 2,5/13 mm
MCA/25/13
ø 2,5/15 mm
MCA/25/15
Çap 2.4 Agresif dişli implant
Halkalı 0-Küreli
ø 2,4/10 mm
MAB-10
ø 2,4/13 mm
MAB-13
ø 2,4/15 mm
MAB-15
ø 2,4/18 mm
MAB-18
0-Küreli Halkasız
ø 2,4/10 mm
NMAB-10
ø 2,4/13 mm
NMAB-13
ø 2,4/15 mm
NMAB-15
Kare başlı ve halka
ø 2,4/10 mm
SMAB-10
ø 2,4/13 mm
SMAB-13
ø 2,4/15 mm
SMAB-15
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IADtMX8ifdIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IADtMX8ifdIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58hBszPYRAghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riXMoxk4FTQ
Scientific Publications
EL Clinical Study – September 2014 – Innovative dental implant design shows improved success rate, bone stability and esthetic benefits
EL Clinical Study • September 2014 Innovative dental implant design shows improved success rate, bone stability and esthetic benefits A retrospective study over 3 years including 2-year follow-up Henriette Lerner, DMD Director of HL Dentclinic (private practice focussed on implantology) The aim of this research is to retrospectively evaluate an innovative implant and prosthetical
EL Clinical Study – February 2015 – How to combine bone stability and aesthetic benefits through innovative implant design Treatment of a 65-year-old patient
EL Clinical Study • February 2015 How to combine bone stability and aesthetic benefits through innovative implant design Treatment of a 65-year-old patient Henriette Lerner HL DENTCLINIC, Dentist, Baden-Baden, Germany We present a clinical case with extensive aesthetic requirements, illustrating the treatment of a 65-year-old patient with a partial edentular situation with all
(BDIZ EDI) Implant-Study 2014/2015 – March 2015 – Quantitative and qualitative element-analysis of implant-surface by SEM and EDX
(BDIZ EDI) Implant-Study 2014/2015 • March 2015 Quantitative and qualitative element-analysis of implant-surface by SEM and EDX Prof. Dr. Dr. Joachim E. Zöller Interdisciplinary Polyclinic for Oral Surgery and Implantology Dept. for Cranio Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Dr. med. dent. Dirk U. Duddeck Head of Surface Analyses, In cooperation with the European
EL Clinical Study – April 2015 – Bone stability and aesthetics using an innovative implant design
EL Clinical Study • April 2015 Bone stability and aesthetics using an innovative implant design Treatment of a 65-year-old patient by DR HENRIETTE LERNER (HL DENTCLINIC), BADEN-BADEN, GERMANY Implant success today consists of more than just “osseointegration accomplished”. We also have to take into account the aesthetic result. The present clinical case with
Innovatives Dental-Implantat-Design – May 2015 – Improved Success Rate, Bone Stability, Esthetic Advantages
Magazine PIP – Issue:2/2015 • May 2015 Improved Success Rate, Bone Stability, Esthetic Advantages Author: Dr Henriette Lerner HL DENTCLINIC Abstract Implant success nowadays means more than just the achievement of osseointegration. We must also take into account the esthetic results. The present case study shows the treatment of a partially edentulous 65-year-old female